Mashpee Environmental Oversight Committee
Minutes of Meeting
April 8, 2010
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
Present: Chairman Don Myers, Ed Baker, Mary Waygan, Rick York
Absent: Ted Theis
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Myers at 7:05 p.m. with a quorum.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Mr. Baker made a motion to accept the minutes of February 11, 2010. Mr. York seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS
There was no public comment.
NEW BUSINESS
Mashpee Commons Presentation-Doug Storrs
Mr. Storrs distributed proposed Mashpee Commons plans, representing two new neighborhoods, to each member of the Commission. Mr. Storrs noted that the initial pages identify the location of the new neighborhoods in proximity to the existing Mashpee Commons, adding that it will continue to be a combination of residential and mixed use. The following pages depict photos of traditional buildings that will be emulated in the planning of the neighborhood. The next page depicts an accessory ground unit. Mr. Storrs referenced Mr. Baker’s question regarding garages, stating that a unit above the garage was typical on Cape Cod. The Chair questioned the height of the buildings and Mr. Storrs responded that most buildings would be 2 stories but some will be 3 stories high. Renderings were
also included in the packet depicting various vistas of the East Steeple Street neighborhood. Plans also include the addition of a church site at Donna’s Lane, where it had originally been cleared for the anticipated Boch Center. Regarding the North Market neighborhood, the road paralleling Rt. 151 will be continued in order to connect with the relocated Frank Hicks Road. Mr. Storrs stated that he does not want the property line to be viewed as a boundary with the Town but recommended considering the entire area without the distinction of Town or private ownership, particularly if the municipal complex is expanded. There was also discussion about the possibility of connecting with the KC Coombs School to create an emergency vehicle roadway. Mr. Storrs indicated that their planning would not eliminate that possibility. There was also discussion regarding an existing bicycle and foot path in the area and the potential for it to be formally
constructed in the future. Mr. Baker questioned access to parking to which Mr. Storrs responded that there would be breaks in the buildings to access parking lots and back accesses to the parking garages. Mr. Storrs added that these plans were still early and that changes will continue to be made based on feedback from Boards and the community.
Ms. Waygan stated that environmental issues had been addressed with the Planning Board such as stormwater, nutrient control, LEED certification and the minimization of automobile use. Mr. Storrs highlighted the bike path on the north side of North Market Street noting his intent that a walkway also be created that will engage it with the buildings. At East Steeple Street, a “pinwheel green” has been added in order to slow traffic by breaking the road around the green to limit the raceway effect and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. Another “pinwheel green” will be located at Donna’s Lane. Primary connections and secondary connections have also been added for access to the main roads. Mr. Storrs also discussed four point signalization that will be
installed at Frank Hicks & Rt. 151, Donna & 28, Market & 151 and Steeple & 28. The lights will better manage traffic so that it does not approach the rotary at the same time. Selectman Myers was pleased with the improvements to the plan.
Mr. Storrs noted that the final three pages represent each street by their “profile” such as on street parking, parking on one side, etc., which represent existing conditions in real historic and functional neighborhoods. Mr. Storrs emphasized the importance of differentiation of housing types and styles in the community, noting that the Mashpee comprehensive plan has called for mixed use and high density housing in the area. Mashpee Commons currently has only 40 apartments and they hope to offer single family housing in the new neighborhoods. Close proximity to Mashpee Commons would allow individuals access to work, shops, the library and public transit without the use of a car. Additionally, Mr. Storrs stated that the area could be better served by public water and tertiary wastewater
treatment since the infrastructure is already in place with plans to expand it. Regarding stormwater, Mashpee Commons prefers the use of pervious surfaces and the Planning Board has recommended the use of rain gardens. The North Market and East Steeple Street development will manage their own water within their neighborhood, but East Steeple may also have an emergency overflow. The current wastewater plant has 80,000 gallons built approved capacity with a permit to expand it to 180,000 gallons.
The tri-party development agreement process with Mashpee and Cape Cod Commission allows everyone to work together, at the same time, with the ability to work out various issues together on the master plan. Although Mashpee Commons will install the infrastructure and meet the permit requirements, the goal is to sell parcels to other parties to assist in the development in the community.
Chairman Myers questioned the availability of green space. Space has not been made available for families with children to play in the community. Mr. Storrs does not envision many people with children living in the East Steeple Street neighborhood but felt that families would be interested in the Jones Whiting area located near the current commons and other open space. Mr. Storrs responded that open space is being provided in a priority habitat area, but not in the center of the community. Ms. Waygan suggested that there may be additional discussion about open space, particularly as it relates to Trout Pond. Mr. Storrs responded that the immediate area around Trout Pond will be protected with wetland setbacks but the balance of the 52 acre neighborhood has been zoned and taxed as commercial
and will ultimately be developed. Ms. Waygan has requested a map of Mashpee Commons’ proposed open space. Mr. Baker requested more details about stormwater.
Santuit Pond Study Results-AECOM
Don Kretchmer of AECOM introduced a PowerPoint presentation depicting the results of the study. Mr. Kretchmer described the pond as shallow with the greatest depth being 9-10 feet and the majority of the pond in the range of 5 feet or less. Mr. Kretchmer noted that more than half of the land around the pond continues to be forested, with low to mid density development in the area closest to the shoreline on both sides. Additionally, a small percentage of cranberry bogs are present as well as some wetland areas.
Overall, the lake area covers 170 acres with a flushing rate of 3 times per year. Mr. Kretchmer noted that, with the flushing rate, there would be a total water exchange approximately every 120 days. It was determined that phosphorus was the critical nutrient fueling the growth of algae in the pond, often resulting in an algae bloom lasting the entire summer. Mr. Kretchmer shared images of a 1957 experiment at a Canadian lake where half of the lake had phosphorus added, resulting in increased algal growth. Mr. Kretchmer also shared images of lake water before and after the addition of lawn fertilizer.
Sarah MacDougall discussed field studies conducted in the pond. In 2009, AECOM conducted studies regarding in lake water quality as well as nutrient content of sediment, groundwater, stormwater and cranberry bog flood discharge. Complementary studies had also been conducted by Mashpee Environmental Coalition, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, Town of Mashpee Water Quality Monitoring Program, State Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Public Health and local residents. All study results from 2009 were assessed.
Ms. MacDougall discussed the dissolved oxygen and temperature, noting that because Santuit was shallow, a strong summer thermal stratification was not created resulting in a water column that was homogenized by blowing winds. In lake summer water profiles showed no major differences between the temperature and dissolved oxygen between the surface and the bottom of the pond. A slight difference occurred in the deeper part of the pond. A Sonde probe was used at the bottom of the pond which provided dissolved oxygen saturation from May 29-June 1 and depicted the larger drops in dissolved oxygen at night due to the lack of photosynthesis. The Sonde also provided information about dissolved oxygen relative to average wind speed and a chart noted the lowest concentration of oxygen occurring during low
wind events. Live organisms and fish require a minimum amount of oxygen in the water and low oxygen conditions would result in a release of phosphorus from the sediment. Ms. MacDougall also shared a chart depicting some water quality results and noted that major indicators of nutrient status were Total Phosphorus and Chlorophyll A. Data has shown that the pond was extremely eutrophic and extremely nutrient rich. AECOM also conducted sediment sampling in four locations, three of which were in the soft mucky sediment and one sampling in the sandy landing. The samples were analyzed to determine the types of phosphorus present, such as loosely absorbed phosphorus and iron bound phosphorus. It was determined that the town landing does not have a high phosphorus concentration but the mucky sediments have large concentrations of available phosphorus, with the potential of being released under low oxygen conditions. Porewater samplers and seepage
meters were also utilized to check data on groundwater quality and quantity. Other than the Timberlane Drive neighborhood, inorganic nitrogen levels were within natural range. Wet weather sampling was conducted and it was noted that the Timberlane Drive stormwater improvements were effective and prevented the sheetflow from directly entering the pond. High phosphorus concentrations were present in the runoff. Regarding two rounds of cranberry bog flood discharge samplings, Ms. MacDougall stated that, overall, the bogs did not contribute a large portion to the nutrient budget, although it was a source that should be addressed. The aquatic plant survey indicated a dramatic shift from previous historical surveys.
Overall, Ms. MacDougall stated that records from 1948 indicated a well oxygenated pond that began to decline in the 1980s, although the pond was still dominated by macrophytes and aquatic plant growth. The water quality declined in 2000 with higher concentrations of Chlorophyll A, sparse plant growth and extensive algal growth. The largest source of phosphorus, responsible for the increasing algal growth, was found in the bottom sediment and totaled 78% of the phosphorus load. Additional sources included water fowl (1%), direct precipitation, septic systems, cranberry bogs, surface runoff and groundwater totaling 3%-5% of the phosphorus budget. The current total average in-lake phosphorus concentration has been calculated to be 80 micrograms per liter, which presents a 97% chance of an algal bloom.
In order to meet designated uses of the pond, such as swimming and recreation, an in-lake target would be needed in order to move toward the goal of infrequent algal blooms. Achievement of an in-lake phosphorus concentration of 15 micrograms per liter would offer a 1% probability of an algal bloom. For the purposes of the study, AECOM used a target of 15 micrograms per liter. Ms. MacDougall shared a chart representing phosphorus loading by source, and when comparing the natural environmental background (before human development) to the current load, the current load measured 93% higher. Ms. MacDougall suggested that the internal loading was a result of historic loading such as watersheds and cranberry bogs. Should Mashpee choose to focus only on addressing internal loading, it would result in
an average total phosphorus concentration of 17, which would not meet the target. Ms. MacDougall emphasized that the Town must look at all sources, internal and external, in order to meet the target of 15 micrograms per liter.
Mr. Kretchmer emphasized that both the watershed sources and the internal load need to be addressed in order to meet the target. Mr. Kretchmer first highlighted best management practices for the watershed and shared photographs highlighting best and worst examples.
Best Management Practices:
Natural Woodland Buffers-A natural woodland buffer reduces erosion, absorbs many nutrients prior to reaching the water, provides habitat in lake and onshore, shades shallow water areas, enhances and improves property values, provides privacy
Conservation Subdivisions-Keep development away from sensitive resources
Open Space-Permanent protection of areas as conservation use or town purchase
Economically Sound Landscape-Available resources
Community Septic-Septic system for multiple homes re-located away from body of water
Stormwater Retrofit-Use of riprap basin to catch sand and prevent nutrients from entering water source, requiring cleaning 2 times per year
Public Education-Information to residents through signage or an information kiosk sharing best practices to improve the pond
Detention/Retention Basins-Mitigation for phosphorus, holding water and allowing it to filtrate and attaching to soil particles to prevent phosphorus from entering the water
Rain Gardens-Use in place of catch basins to allow road runoff to pond and slowly seep into ground rather than directly into the water
Infiltration Trench & Swale-Water enters an interceptor trench, which then infiltrates the ground and reduces the phosphorus
Pervious Pavement-Allows the runoff to flow through the pavement; recommended for the boat ramp that is currently gravel and eroding, grass can be planted depending upon amount of traffic
Mr. Kretchmer also discussed specific watershed recommendations that will be highlighted in the final report.
Watershed Recommendations:
Lawn Fertilizer Limitation-Recommend use of no phosphorus (0) fertilizer or use of organic fertilizers
Construction Site Best Management Practices-Practices on Cape have been good but occasionally overlooked
Natural Shoreline Buffers-As discussed previously
Structural Stormwater BMPs-To encourage more infiltration in such locations as the Town Landing area, non-bermed areas of Timberlane Drive, Bryants Neck neighborhood, Beechwood Point Drive, Cranberry Lane
Continue and Enhance BMPs at Cranberry Bogs-Phosphorus has been lower compared to historic practices, continue to use low or no phosphorus fertilizers, use of computer operated irrigation systems for frost protection, pumping flood water upland to allow phosphorus to settle prior to releasing water back into the pond
Septic Upgrades-Failing septic systems must be remedied and upgraded
Waterfowl Control-Discourage feeding waterfowl and discourage them from living on residential properties since they create a lot of nutrients
Mr. Kretchmer then addressed how to resolve the issue of internal loading. The pond has been experiencing re-suspension and release of sediments, with approximately 70% of phosphorus being generated. During the summer the phosphorus, which has been held in the sediment with iron, reached the photic zone and when mixed by the wind, fueled more algae blooms. Mr. Kretchmer felt that phosphorus was being released approximately every couple of weeks, but possibly nightly in some cases. Mr. York confirmed that low and reduced oxygen was often detected during the summer. Mr. Kretchmer described the ways in which algae responded to the release of phosphorus. Internal loading has been suspected as an issue because accumulated phosphorus and surficial sediment are at 600-900 milligrams per
kilogram, which is a high number encouraging the release of phosphorus. It was noted that the phosphorus will migrate from the sediment. A variety of techniques exist that deal with internal loading and will control algae blooms. In considering the various options, the team considered each techniques’ successes at other locations, whether or not it would apply and be successful at Santuit Pond, whether it would be technically and economically feasible and could it be permitted.
Alternative Techniques-Eliminated from Consideration:
Hypolimnetic Aeration-Oxygen added to deep portions of the lake, but there is no strong stratification in Santuit Pond
Dilution & Flushing-Viable option if a source of clean water and fast flushing rate, but Santuit does not have a good, continuing source of clean water
Draw Down-Dropping the water level down to consolidate the sediments, but was excluded because there is limited hydraulic control of the Pond and works better with dammed bodies of water
Dry Dredging-Drop the water level in order to remove the sediments with heavy equipment, but there is no control of Santuit’s water
Wet Excavation-Pond is too large, limiting access from the shore
Light Blocking with Dyes-Use of dark dyes to prevent growth of algae but pond is too large and flushes too often
-Mechanical Removal-Pond is too large and algae is dispersed
--Selective Withdrawal-Removes poor quality water at the bottom but since the pond is often mixed, it would not be effective and would re-locate the problem downstream
Algaecides-Potentially toxic to other organisms and a short term solution
Sediment Oxidation-A newer technique making use of oxygenated agents and ph adjustors to oxidize the sediments; other locations have presented mixed results and suggested the possible release of nitrogen and unsure of longevity
Nutrient Addition-Add nitrogen to diminish the blue-green algae, but not an option on Cape Cod
Biologic Controls-Increase bass to decrease smaller fish, which increases zooplankton which eats more algae and could be used in conjunction with other techniques
Mr. Kretchmer described the benefits of circulation and the action of mixing algal cells below the light in the dark zone where it would be difficult to survive. As the algal cells are continually mixed into the dark zone, they will begin to die off. The scum formation may be reduced by continual mixing and the species may change. Circulation during the calm periods could also reduce the internal loading of phosphorus as oxygen is moved from the surface to the sediment and the water with low oxygen will be moved to the surface to pick up oxygen and rotate back to the bottom. A windy day would provide a similar benefit. However, many of the systems are large and located on the surface, creating limits to navigation and recreation. Allen Waxman of The Santuit Friends offered to provide
AECOM with cost estimates for alternative techniques that had been researched by his organization. Copies are attached to these minutes.
Alternative Techniques-To Be Considered:
Circulation-Fountains which are typically used in small ponds; Air Flotation where air bubbles from the bottom create a vortex to mix the water; Solar Circulators where, in Santuit Pond, 5-10, 9 foot tall units would be needed; COST $200,00-$400,000
Hydraulic Dredging-Sediment would be removed in a slurry with a pipe, left to de-water on land and the remaining solids would be removed by truck; a large land area would be needed to de-water; nutrients and algal cell seed bank would be removed directly; all soft sediment would need to be removed to the sand; the amount of sediment at the bottom of the is unknown; process is expensive compared to other options; COST $12-$16 million
In-Lake Phosphorus Inactivation with Alum-Process would change the binder from iron to aluminum to prevent the release of phosphorus; process would affect the upper 2-4 inches of the sediment; the treatment would last for some time provided no additional sources of phosphorus were added; other issues include knowing incoming sources of phosphorus, system hydrology, water chemistry, sensitive species, where the alum could travel; in order to avoid toxicity, doses less than 5 mg per liter are used to treat defined areas of the pond; COST $180,000-$200,000
Mr. York responded that due to cost, dredging could be eliminated. Regarding nutrient inactivation, Mr. York expressed concern that water would be mixed during winds, risking exposure to fish. Mr. York added that algae are always present and questioned the treatment’s effectiveness if algae are layered on top of the aluminum creating an additional phosphorus source. Mr. Kretchmer responded that the goal was to break the cycle of continual release from the sediment. Mr. Kretchmer continued that fish could be protected by applying the aluminum in a checkerboard pattern to provide a refuge for the fish, noting that the aluminum flock remained in the sediment and would not migrate once it reaches the bottom. Mr. York suggested that the solar unit mixer appeared to be the most cost effective
option for Santuit. Mr. York questioned the percentage of lawn fertilizer present in the total phosphorus percentage. Ms. MacDougall responded that a conservative estimate of the entire phosphorus load reduction, based on circulation, was determined by AECOM and that the entire 78% reduction could not be achieved by any method. It was estimated that it could be reduced to 17% with 100% reduction. Ms. MacDougall added that the circulation technique could be ineffective if there were not enough units in the pond. Mr. York supported the idea of circulation and added that federal funding was being sought to address the issue as soon as possible. It was suggested that each circulation unit could manage approximately 40 acres. Mr. York added that monitoring units were available in the pond to monitor the phosphorus and the effectiveness of the units.
Mr. Waxman also spoke favorably regarding the success of the circulators at other locations. The Chair confirmed that the circulators would be a permanent fixture in the pond in order to address the phosphorus in the sediment. Mr. Baker expressed concern that the phosphorus would remain in the pond and suggested that the circulators would be a short term solution. Mr. Waxman noted draft legislation that would ban the use of phosphorus in fertilizers for existing lawns as an effort to limit the addition of phosphorus to the pond. Mr. Kretchmer summarized AECOM’s recommendation to break the cycle of release by stopping the internal load and lowering the external phosphorus load to return to an improved state of the pond. Mr. Baker expressed interest in re-visiting the option of draw down
since the pond seemed to be running higher than it was historically. Mr. Baker suggested running the pond 5 inches lower, or increase flushing with a partial draw down during the winter, which in the long run, could reduce phosphorus in the sediment. Mr. York agreed that the pond was running higher than normal and efforts were being made to lower the pond, but that the pond is flushing only 3 times each year and that increasing the flushing rate would not resolve problem. Mr. Kretchmer will provide more details in the report regarding hydrology and nutrient load.
The Chair questioned the longevity of the phosphorus in the sediment, to which Mr. Kretchmer confirmed that it would remain indefinitely since it was an element. The Chair questioned whether a combination of the recommendations would be effective, such as using alum for 50% of the pond and circulators for the remaining area but Mr. Kretchmer thought that it would be overkill. Mr. Kretchmer emphasized the need to eliminate watershed sources of phosphorus in order to utilize the alum treatment, which could then last for approximately 15 years. However, although results from the alum treatment would be immediate to address 90% of the phosphorus, it would be difficult to eliminate all watershed issues, requiring repeated alum treatments. Ms. Waygan recommended that, in the final report, Mr. Kretchmer
bullet the specific watershed recommendations in order to highlight the ways in which the Town can impact the pond.
Mr. Ralph Baker, owner of nearby cranberry bogs, questioned whether or not samples had been taken to determine whether the cranberry bogs were responsible for the addition of phosphorus. No forensic studies had been conducted. Mr. Ralph Baker also expressed frustration that bogs had often been blamed for trouble but never acknowledged for contributions or improvements to the environment. Mr. Baker shared an anecdote about when he used green water on his bogs that turned clear within 5 days, and noted the improvement of his bogs with use of the pond water. Mr. Baker added that the pond was originally a swamp and was created to assist with the irrigation of 100 acres of bogs. Mr. Baker also stated that he uses very limited amounts of fertilizer. It was noted that cranberry bogs had been
determined to be only a small source of the addition of phosphorus to the pond. Mr. Royce Baker confirmed that there were 2 active bogs that take and return water to the pond and expressed frustration that water studies were not conducted during the winter when water was held by the cranberry bogs. It was suggested that increased activity of the bogs could benefit the pond. Mr. Kretchmer suggested that inorganic phosphorus fertilizers were being used in the 50s and 60s and more intensely in the 70s and 80s. In response to the use of bogs to improve the pond, Mr. Kretchmer stated that the deepest part of the pond needed to be addressed and that the pond requires action in the summertime, but bog growers would not be flooding their bogs.
Mr. Waxman reported that Friends of Santuit Pond had researched other communities using a combination of treatments and stated that chemical treatment was reduced along with the use of the solar circulators. Ms. Waygan questioned residents’ willingness to support the circulators in the pond. Mr. Waxman stated that hundreds of communities are using the units successfully and reported that his membership supports the use of the solar circulators. The Chair questioned educating residents to change their habits regarding phosphorus loading and Mr. Waxman felt that educating residents could be accomplished through the paper and the Town could submit draft legislation to the state to address rainwater runoff. Mr. York emphasized that something should be done now because of the risk to humans and
animals and supported the use of solar circulators until a better solution becomes available in the future.
Evelyn Bushenfeld, a resident of Santuit Pond, stated that an effort had been initiated by the Town to have the abandoned bog managed by an organic farmer. Ms. Bushenfeld questioned the impact of watercraft such as jet skis. Mr. Kretchmer stated that watercraft have been known to cause shore erosion as well as mixing up the water column. Ms. Bushenfeld asked that the Town address the issue.
George Schmidt, of Bryants Neck, noted that, although a town by-law could limit use of phosphorus fertilizer, without a regional regulation, residents could purchase phosphorus containing fertilizer elsewhere. Mr. Schmidt questioned re-stocking the pond with bass and Mr. Kretchmer responded that there were many predators that could improve the health of the pond, and that it is more of a fisheries management issue and educating people to not remove all of the largest fish.
The Chair questioned which of the three in-lake recommendations Mr. Kretchmer recommended to which he suggested that it would depend upon the public. Dredging was likely too expensive to be considered. Mr. Kretchmer stated that alum treatments have been successful on the Cape and now offer better control of toxicity and improved information has recently become available supporting the solar circulators. A discussion ensued regarding alum toxicity and the ways in which toxicity could be avoided with treatment.
The Chair questioned sources of funding available to assist with the costs of improving the pond. Ms. MacDougall indicated that she could add information to the final report such as State 319 grants which address BMPs for the watershed, although those grants tend to be competitive. Mr. Kretchmer noted that some projects have been funded by direct legislation. AECOM does provide grant writing services. Mr. Waxman questioned whether or not the project could be considered for the Cape Cod Waterways $30 million grant. Mr. York stated that the grant has been restricted to herring runs, road runoff and tidal restrictions and more information will become available. John Kabat has been in contact about state funding and has not yet identified any funding options.
Mr. Schmidt questioned whether Town by-laws could mandate inspection of septic systems within 300 feet of waterways, ponds or oceans. The Chair stated that an inspection could be mandated but questioned whether a homeowner could be forced to upgrade the system. Ms. Waygan questioned plans for a survey about the quality of the septic systems in Mashpee. Ms. MacDougall responded that the Board of Health did not receive a response in time but recommended that it be researched further. Ms. Waygan asked Ms. MacDougall to send a list of questions to be shared with the Board of Health.
AECOM will be accepting comments on the draft report and have requested that comments be filtered through the Environmental Oversight Committee. Comments may be sent to Town Administration, c/o Environmental Oversight Committee. An electronic version of the presentation was requested. The Chair questioned the timing of a final report and recommended that all comments should be submitted by the end of April to be discussed at the next meeting on May 13. A final report is expected for June 1.
MASHPEE BLUE BOOK
Beverly Kane is in possession of 61 works of art from the schools with plans to review them with the Mashpee Environmental Committee and recommend the final contenders to the Environmental Oversight Committee. It was believed that the $15,000 amount to fund the document was still listed in the budget, but it will be confirmed with Joyce Mason. Ms. Waygan stated that they were not going to pursue grant opportunities until the $15,000 was confirmed. Selectman Cahalane planned to contact the Chamber of Commerce regarding the naming of the book. Mr. Baker asked that the Chair follow up with Selectman Cahalane.
OLD BUSINESS
Action Items
Due to the lateness of the meeting, it was decided that Action Items would be reviewed at the next Environmental Oversight meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Ms. Waygan announced that the Planning Board will be hosting a public hearing regarding the Rules and Regulations for the Subdivisions on May 5. Changes regarding stormwater have been incorporated and Ms. Waygan will forward the document to the Committee.
The Chair announced that he will no longer be serving on the Environmental Oversight Committee and thanked everyone for their involvement and participation. Members expressed their appreciation for Selectman Myers’ leadership.
MEETING ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Baker made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 p.m. Mr. York seconded the motion. All approved unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer M. Clifford
Board Secretary
| 
